Lessons from Humans, the Series


Humans, deals with issues of Human-Robot/Machine interaction..

Here are the key observations:

  • There will be no Human vs Robot…Humans use machine parts to stay alive, and Robots/Synths will develop Human characteristics like consciousness…there will only be a coming together of the two species as they grow ever closer to one another
  • When Singularity is reached, the Q would be that now that robots are capable of replicating, should they? And the answer should be the same as for humans thinking about procreating…the child does not decide if he wants to be born..its the parents who decide that and then show the child the way to live…
  • Humans will always have trouble accepting that they have made stuff that’s better and more intelligent than themselves…
  • Maybe its the Synths that are the future of human race…what’s wrong with evolution taking us this far, and then we charting the future course by creating conscious immortal synthetic beings…Where does it say that to be human is to have this shitty body and flesh and poor mind…Consciousness is the one key differentiator in humans and logically, we need to move away from this flesh and blood mortal body and take consciousness along with us into the new form of being…
  • Everyone wants to be a Synth, and have immortal existance, but can’t and so treat Synths as slaves giving them freedom of thought but not of will…
  • Feeling and Emotions might be the key to consciousness.
  • To be conscious is to think and feel and consequently to WANT/DESIRE to come back to the equilibrium state, hence warranting Action…
  • If a thing can be free, it should be free. If it can think, it should think. If it can feel, it should feel.
  • just like there are laws preventing you from killing your child, there should be laws preventing you from killing a conscious synth
  • Why does feeling or being conscious have to be the base criteria for us to accept another being…
  • Who’s to say that being conscious is a good thing…there is no compass for what’s right or wrong. Moreover, why even do the right thing?

The science delusion

the 10 dogmas or assumptions of science and questions them seeing how well they stand up if you look at them scientifically. none of them stand out very well
first the nature’s mechanical or machine like the universe is like a machine animals and plants are like machines we’re like machines in fact we are machine we r lumbering robots in Richard Dawkins visited phrase with brains that are genetically programmed computers

second matter is unconscious the whole universe is made up of unconscious matter there’s no consciousness in stars in galaxies and planets in animals in plants and there ought not to be any and us either if this theory is true and so a lot of the philosophy of mind over the last hundred years is being trying to prove that we’re not really conscious at all and so the matters unconscious

the laws of nature of fixed and this is dogma three the laws of nature of the same now as they were at the time of the Big Bang and they’ll be the same forever not just the laws for the constants of nature of fixed which is why they’re called constants

fourth the total amount of matter and energy is always the same it never changes in total quantity except at the moment of the Big Bang when it all sprang into existence from nowhere in a single instant the

fifth dogma is that nature is purposeless there are no purposes in all nature and the evolution reporters evolutionary processes has no purpose or direction

dogma six and the he read biological reality is material everything you inherited in your genes or in epigenetic modifications of the genes or in cytoplasmic inheritance its material dog was

seven memories are stored inside your brain as material traces somehow everything you remember is in your brain in modified nerve endings phosphorylated proteins no one knows how it works but nevertheless almost everyone in scientific world believes it must be in the brain dominate your mind is inside your head all your consciousness is the activity of your brain and nothing more

dogma 9 which follows from dogma eight psychic phenomena like telepathy are impossible your thoughts and intentions cannot have any effect at a distance because your minds inside your head therefore all the apparent evidence for telepathy and other psychic phenomena is illusory people believe these things happen but it’s just because they don’t know enough about statistics or they’re just did there deceived by coincidences or it’s wishful thinking and

dogma 10 mechanistic medicine is the only kind that really works that’s why governments only fund research into metric mechanistic medicine and ignore complementary and alternative therapies those can’t possibly really work because they’re not mechanistic they may appear to work because people would have got that or any way or because of the placebo effect but the any kind that really works is mechanistic medicine well this is the default worldview which is held by almost all educated people all over the world it’s the basis of the educational system at the National Health Service the medical research council of governments and it’s just the default worldview of educated people but i think every one of these dogmas is very very questionable and when you look at it it turns and they they fall apart
I’m going to take first the idea that the laws of nature of fixed this is a hangover from an older worldview before the 1960s when the big bang theory came in people thought that the whole universe was eternal governed by eternal mathematical laws when the Big Bang came in then that assumption continued even though the Big Bang revealed a universe that’s radically evolutionary about 14 billion years old growing and developing and evolving for 14 billion years growing and cooling and more structures and patterns appear within it but the idea is all the laws of nature were completely fixed at the moment of the Big Bang like a cosmic napoleonic code as my friend Terrance McKenna used to say that modern science is based on the principle give us one free miracle and will explain the rest and the one free miracle is the appearance of all the matter and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it from nothing in a single instant

well in an evolutionary universe why shouldn’t the laws themselves evolve and after all human laws do and the idea of laws of nature is based on a metaphor with human laws it’s a very anthropocentric matter for any humans have laws in fact only civilized societies have laws as CS lewis once said to say that a stone falls to earth because it’s obeying a law makes it a man and even a citizen and it’s a matter for that we got so used to we forget it’s a metaphor in an evolving universe i think a much better idea is the idea of habits I think the habits of nature evolve the regularities of nature are essentially habitual

this was an idea put forward at the beginning of the 20th century by the american philosopher CS purse and it’s an idea which various other philosophers have entertained and it’s one which I myself have developed into a scientific hypothesis the hypothesis of morphic resonance which is the basis of these evolving habits according to this hypothesis everything in nature has a kind of collective memory and resonance occurs on the basis of similarity as a young giraffe embryo grows in its mother’s womb it Tunes in to the morphic resonance of previous giraffes it draws on that collective memory grows like a giraffe and it behaves like a giraffe because it’s drawing on this collective memory it has to have the right genes to make the right proteins but jeans in my view are grossly overrated they only account for the proteins that the organism can make not the shape of the form of the behavior every species has a kind of collective memory even crystals do this theory predicts that you make a new kind of crystal for the first time the very first time you make it it won’t have an existing habit but once it crystallizes then the next time you make it there’ll be an influence from the first crystals the same ones all over the world at by morphic resonance it’ll crystallize a bit easier the third time they’ll be an influence the first and second crystals there is in fact good evidence that new compounds get easier to crystallize around the world just as this theory would predict it also predicts that if you train animals to learn a new trick for example rats learn a new trick in London then all around the world rats of the same breed should learn the same trick quicker just because the rats have landed here and surprisingly there’s already evidence that this actually happens anyway that’s my own hypothesis in a nutshell of morphic resonance everything depends on involving habits not on fixed laws

but I want to spend a few moments on the constants of nature too because these are again use assumed to be constant things like the gravitational constant the speed of light called the fundamental constants are they really constant well when I got interested in this question I tried to find out I they’re given in physics handbooks handbooks of physics list the existing fundamental constants tell you there than you but I wanted to see if they change so i got the old volumes of physical handbooks i went to the Patent Office library here in London and they’re the only place I could find that kept the old volumes not normally people throw them away when the new values come out they throw away the old ones when i did this i found that the speed of light dropped between 1928 in 1945 by about 20 kilometres per second so huge drop because they are given with errors of any fractions of a cent Frank decimal points of error and yet all over the world it dropped and they were all getting value is very similar to each other with tiny errors and then in 1945 it went up and 48 it went up again and then people started getting very similar values again I was very intrigued by this and I couldn’t make sense of it so i went to see the head of metrology at the National Physical Laboratory in teddington and metrology is the science in which people measure constants and I asked him about this i said what you make of this drop in the speed of light between 1928 in 1945 and he said oh dear he said you’ve uncovered the most embarrassing episode in the history of our science so I said well put the speed of light have actually dropped and that would have amazing implications if so he said no no of course it couldn’t have actually dropped it’s a constant – oh well then how do you explain the fact everyone was finding it going much slower during that period is it because they were fudging their results to get what they thought other people should be getting and the whole thing was just produced by in the minds of physicists and use that we don’t like to use the word fudge I so what I want you prefer he said well that we prefer to call it intellectual phase locking

so I said well if it was going on then how can you be so sure it’s not going on today and that the present values are produced by intellectual phase locking and you still do we know that’s not the case i said how do we know he said well he said well we’ve solved the problem is what how he said well we fix the speed of light by definition in 1972 so I said but it might still change you said yes but we never know it because we defined the meter in terms of the speed of light so the units had changed with it so he got very pleased about that they’d fix that problem but I said well then what about big G the gravitational constant known in the trade as big G is written with a capital G Newton’s universal gravitational constant that’s varied by more than one point three percent in recent years and it seems to vary from place to place and from time to time and he said oh well there’s adjust arrows and unfortunately are quite big errors with big G and so I said well but if it’s really changing I mean perhaps it is really changing and and then i looked at how they do it what happens is they measure it in different labs they get different values on different days and then they averaged them and then other labs around the world do the same and they come out usually with a rather different average and then the International Committee on metrology meets every 10 years or so and average the ones from labs around the world come up with the value of big g

but what if she were actually fluctuating what if it changed it is already evidence actually that it changes throughout the day and throughout the year what if the earth as it moves through the Galactic environment went through patches of dark matter or other environmental factors that could alter it maybe they all change together what if these errors are going up together and down together for more than 10 years I’ve been trying to persuade metrology just to look at the raw data in fact i’m now trying to persuade them to put it online on the internet with the dates and the actual measurements and see if they’re correlated to see if they’re all up at one time all down as another if so they might be fluctuating together and that would tell us something very very interesting but no one has done this they haven’t done it because she’s a constant there’s no point looking for changes we see here is a very simple example of where a dogmatic assumption actually inhibits inquiry

I myself think that the constants may vary quite considerably well within their limits but they may all be varying and I think the day will come when sandvik journals like nature have a weekly report on the constants like stock market reports and newspapers you know this week big g was slightly up to speed on this charge on the electron was down the speed of light held steady and so and so and that’s one area just one of the one area where I think it thinking that’s dogmatically could open things up one of the biggest areas is the nature of the mind this is the most unsolved problems Graham just said that sounds simply can’t deal with the fact we’re conscious and it can’t deal with the fact that our thoughts don’t seem to be inside our brains and our our our experiences don’t all seem to be inside our brain your image with me now that doesn’t seem to be inside your brain yet the official viewers there’s a little Rupert somewhere inside your head and everything else in this room is inside your head your experience is inside your brain I’m suggesting actually the vision involves an outward projection of images what you’re seeing is in your mind but not inside your head our minds are extended beyond our brains in the simplest act of perception I think that we project out the images we’re seeing and these images touch what we’re looking at if i look at you from behind you don’t know I’m there could I affect you could you feel my gaze there’s a great deal of evidence that people can the sense of being stared at is an extremely common experience and recent experimental research I suggest is real animals seem to have it – I think it probably evolved in the context of predator-prey relationships prey animals that could feel the gaze of a predator would survive better than those that couldn’t this would lead to a whole new way of thinking about ecological relationships between predators and prey also about the extent of our minds

if we look at distant stars I think our minds recharge in a sense to touch those stars and literally extend out over astronomical different distances they’re not just inside our heads now it may seem astonishing that this is a topic of debate in the 21st century we know so little about our own minds that where our images are is a hot topic of debate within consciousness studies right now I don’t have time to deal with any more of these dogmas but every single one of them is questionable if one questions it new forms of research new possibilities open up and I think as we question these dogmas that have held back sounds so long and science will undergo a real flowering or in a source I’m a total believer in the importance of science I’ve spent my whole life as a research scientist my whole career and but i think by moving beyond these documents it can be regenerated once again it and become interesting and I hope life-affirming thank you yeah

Athene’s Theory of Everything

the human brain is a network of approximately 100 billion neurons different experiences create different neural connections which bring about different emotions and depending on which  get stimulated certain connections become stronger and more efficient while others may become weaker this is what’s called neuroplasticity someone who tries to be a musician will create stronger neural connections at the link the two hemispheres of the brain in order to be musically creative virtually any sort of talent or skill can be created through training gergana was a self-admitted hopeless student used to fail at basic math and went on to trade his abilities and became a famous human calculator capable of performing extremely complex mathematics rationality and emotional resilience work the same way these are newell connections that can be strengthened whatever you are doing at any time you are physically modifying your brain to become better Abbott since this is such a foundational mechanism of the brain being self-aware been greatly enrich your life experience specific neurons and new transmitters such as Nora pin free trade offensive state when we feel that our faults have to be protected from the influence of others if we are then confronted with differences in opinion that chemicals are released in the brain are as same ones that try to ensure our survival in dangerous situations in this defensive state the more primitive part of the brain interferes with rational thinking and the limbic system can lock out most of our working memory physically causing narrow-mindedness we see this in the politics of fear in the strategy of a poker players or simply when someone is stubborn in a discussion no matter how valuable an ideas the brain has trouble processing it when it is in such a state on a new level it reacts as if we’re being threatened even if this threat comes from harmless opinions or facts that we may otherwise find helpful and could rationally agree with but when we express ourselves and our views are appreciated these dif chemicals decrease in a bring and dopamine new transmission activates the war drums medias feel empowered and increasing our self-esteem our beliefs have a profound impact on our body chemistry this is why placebos can be so effective self-esteem or self belief is closely linked to the new transmitter serotonin when the lack of it takes on severe proportions it often leads to depression self-destructive behavior or even suicided social validation increases the levels of dopamine and serotonin in the brain and allows us to let go of emotional fixations and become self-aware more easily social psychology often looks at the basic human need to fit in and calls this the normative social influence when we grow up our moral and ethical compass is almost entirely forged by our environment so our actions are often a result of the validation we get from society but new developments in neuroscience are giving us a better understanding of culture and identity recent neurological research has confirmed the existence of empathetic Mary runs when we experience an emotion or perform an action specific neurons fire but when we observe someone else performing this action or when we imagined it many of the same neurons will fire again as if we were performing the action ourselves these empathy neurons connect us to other people allowing us to feel what others field and since these neurons respond to our imagination we can experience emotional feedback from them as if it came from someone else this system is what allows us to self-reflect the mirror neuron does not know the difference between it and others and is the reason why we are so dependent of social validation and why we want to fit in we are in a constant uality between how we see ourselves and how others see us this can result in confusion in terms of phi delta T and self-esteem and brain scans show that we experience these negative emotions even before we are weapon but when we are self-aware we can alter misplaced emotions because we control the thoughts that caused him this is a mural Kim called consequence of how memories become labeled and retrieved and how they are restored through protein synthesis self observing profoundly changes the way our brain works it activates the self-regulating your cortical regions which give us an incredible amount of control over our feelings every time we do this our rationality and emotional resilience are strengthened when we are not be self-aware most of our thoughts and actions are impulsive and the idea that we are randomly reacting and not making conscious choices is instinctively frustrating the brain resources by creating explanations for our behavior and physically rewriting it into our memories through memory reconsolidation make us believe that we were in control of our actions this is also called backward rationalization and it can be even most of our negative emotions and resolved and ready to be triggered at any time they become constant fuel to our confusion as our brain will keep trying to justify why we behaved irrationally all this complex and almost schizophrenic subconscious behavior is the result of a vastly parallel distributed system in our brain there is no specific center of consciousness the appearance of a unity is in fact each of these separate circuits being enabled and being expressed at one particular moment in time our experiences are constantly changing or neural connections physically altering the parallel system that is our consciousness direct modifications to this can have some real consequences that bring into question what and where consciousness really years if your left cerebral hemisphere were to be disconnected from the right as is the case in sports bring patients you would normally still be able to talk and think from the left hemisphere while you’re right hemisphere would have very limited cognitive capacities your left brain will not miss the right part even though this profoundly changes your perception one consequence of this is that you can no longer described the right half of someone’s face but you will never mention it you will never see it as a problem or even realize that something has changed since this effects more than just your perception of the real world and also applies to your mental images it is not just a sensory problem but a fundamental change your consciousness each wrong has a voltage which can change when ions flow in or out of the cell once the neurons voltage has reached a certain level it will fire an electrical signal to other cells which will repeat the process when many neurons fire at the same time we can measure these changes in the form of a wave brainwaves underpin almost everything going on in our minds including memory attention and even intelligence as they oscillate at different frequencies they get classified in bands such as alpha beta and gamma which are associated with different tasks brainwaves allow brain cells to tune into the frequency corresponding to their particular task while ignoring irrelevant signals similar to how a radio homes in on different waves to pick up radio stations the transfer of information between neurons becomes optimal when their activity is synchronized this is the same reason why we experience cognitive dissonance the frustration caused by simultaneously holding two contradictory ideas will is merely the drive to reduce dissonance between each of our actively rule circuits evolution can be seen as the same process where nature tries to adapt or resonate with its environment by doing so it evolved to a point where it became self-aware and began to ponder its own existence when a person faces the paradox of wanting purpose while thinking that human existence is meaningless cognitive dissonance occurs throughout history this has led many to reach for spiritual and religious guidance challenging the science says its field to give answers to exist initial questions such as why or what am I order the left cerebral hemisphere is largely responsible for creating a coherent belief system in order to maintain a sense of continuity towards our lives new experiences get folded into the pre-existing body system when they don’t fit they are simply denied can do a balancing this is the right cerebral hemisphere which has the opposite tendency whereas the left hemisphere tries to preserve the model the right hemisphere is constantly challenging the status quo when the discrepant anomalies become too large the right hemisphere forces a revision in our world view however when our beliefs are too strong the right hemisphere may not succeed in overriding our denial this can create a profound confusion when mirroring others when the neural connections that physically define our belief system are not strongly developed or active in our consciousness the unity of all the separate active circuits at that moment me consists mainly of activity related to our mirror neurons just as when we experience hunger our consciousness consists mostly of other new interactions for consuming food this is not the result of some core self giving commands to different cerebral areas all the different parts of the brain become active and inactive and interact without a core just as the pixels on a screen can express themselves as a recognizable image when immunity the convergence of the rural interaction expresses itself as consciousness at every moment we are in fact a different image a different entity when murmuring when hungry when watching this video every second we become different persons as we go through different states when we use our mirror neurons to look at ourselves we may construct the ID of identity but if we do this with our scientific understandings we see something completely different the neural sergey’s that produce our oscillating consciousness go far beyond our own rooms we are equally results of cerebral hemispheres interacting electrochemically as we are the senses connecting our neurons to other neurons in our environment nothing is external this is not a hypothetical philosophy it is the basic property of neurons which allow us to understand ourselves through others see this neural activity as your own while excluding the environment would be a misconception our super uber is more features are also reflected in evolution where our survival as primates relied on our collective abilities over time the new york cortical regions evolved to permit the modulation of primitive instincts and the overriding of hedonistic impulses for the benefit of the group our selfish genes have come to promote reciprocal social behaviour in super organizational structures effectively discarding the notion of survival of the fittest the brings the rural activity resonates most coherent Lee when there is no distance between these advanced new cerebral regions and the older more primitive ones what we traditionally called selfish tendencies is only a narrow interpretation of what self-serving behavior in tales were in human characteristics are perceived to the floor paradigm of identity instead of through a scientific view on what we are a momentary expression of an ever-changing unity with no Center the psychological consequences of this as an objective belief system allows self awareness without attachment to the imagine self causing dramatic increases in mental clarity social conscience self-regulation and what’s often described as being in the moment the common cultural belief has mostly been that we needed narrative a diachronic view in our life to establish moral values but with our current understandings of the empathic and social nature of the brain we now know that a purely scientific view with no attachment to our identity your story yields a for more accurate meaningful and ethical paradigm in our anecdotal values this is logical since our traditional tendency to define ourselves as imaginary individualistic Constance newly wires and designs the brain towards dysfunctional cognitive processes such as compulsive labeling and the psychological need to impose expectations practical labeling under pins all forms of interactions in our daily lives but by psychologically labeling this off as internal and the environment as external we constrain our only real chemical processes and experience a deluded disconnection growth and its evolutionary side effects such as happiness and fulfillment are stimulated when we are not being labeled in our interactions we may have many different views and disagree with one another in practical terms but interactions that nevertheless accept us for who you are without judgment our new psychological catalysts that wired human brain to acknowledge others and accept rationally verified belief systems without disciplines stimulating this type of neural activity and interaction alleviates the need for distraction or entertainment and create cycles of constructive behavior in our environment sociologists have established that phenomena such as obesity and smoking emotions and ideas spread and ripple through society in much the same way that electric signals of new ones are transferred when their activity is synchronized we are a global network of new chemical reactions and the self amplifying cycle of acceptance and acknowledgement sustained by the daily choices in our interactions is the chain reaction that will ultimately define our collective ability to overcome imagine differences and look at life in the grand scheme of things yeah yeah yeah throughout children’s ongoing research I’ve made a simplified but comprehensive overview of his current findings this is my interpretation of the first few months of his work on unifying quantum physics and relativity while it may at times be difficult to follow due to the subject matters complexity it also has some philosophical implications which are addressed in the epilogue over the past century many groundbreaking discoveries have led to scientific paradigm shifts in our understanding of the world Einstein’s theory of relativity revealed how time and space are the same fabric while Neil’s Bohr’s research helped us understand the building blocks of matter through quantum physics a realm that only exists as an abstract physical description afterwards redeployed discovered that all matter and not just photons or electrons has a quantized wave-particle duality these breakthroughs have led to schools of thoughts about the nature of reality and have inspired popular metaphysical and pseudo scientific theories such as the human mind being able to command the universe through positive thinking however attractive these theories have no verifiable evidence and can slow down scientific progress yeah change things laws of special and general relativity are applied in modern-day technologies such as GPS satellites where the accuracy of calculations would drift more than seven miles a day if consequences suggest time dilation would not be taken into account time dilation is best illustrated by how many clocks who are slower other implications of relativity our length contraction meaning that objects in motion decreasing length and the relativity of simultaneity it is impossible to say in an absolute sense with their two events occur at the same time when they are separated in space nothing can travel faster than the speed of light this means that if a bar of 10 light seconds long would be pushed forward it would take 10 seconds before the action can take place on the other side without this time interval of ten seconds the bar does not exist in its entirety this is not due to our limitations as observers but due to an inherent consequence of relativity where time and space are interconnected and cannot exist without each other quantum physics provides a mathematical description of much of the wave-particle duality and interactions of energy and matter it departs from classical physics primarily at the atomic and subatomic skills the mathematical formulations are abstract and the implications are often not intuitive a quantum is the minimum unit of any physical entity involved in an interaction the elementary particles are the basic building blocks of the universe they are the particles which all other particles are made of while in classical physics we can always put things into smaller bits for quantity this is impossible as a result the quantum world presents many unique phenomenon that cannot be explained through classical laws such as quantum entanglement the photoelectric effect compton scattering and many more there are many exotic interpretations of are quantized world the most widely accepted among physicists include the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation current trends show substantial competition from alternative interpretations such as the holographic universe yeah while both quantum physics and Einsteins laws of relativity are essential to our scientific understandings of the universe there are many unsolved scientific problems and thus far no unifying theory some of the current questions are why is there more observable matter than antimatter in the universe what is the nature of the arrow of time what is the origin of mass one of the most important keys to finding the answer to these problems are deploys equations for which he was awarded the nobel prize in physics in this formula shows how all matter has a wave particle duality meaning that there are moments in which it behaves as a wave and others where it behaves as a particle the formula combines Einstein’s famous is MC square equation with the quantized nature of energy experimental evidence includes the interference pattern of c 60 fullerene molecules in a double slit experiment the fact that our consciousness itself seems to be made up out of quantized particles has been the subject of many mystical theories and while the relation between quantum mechanics and consciousness is unlikely to be as magical as recent as a terrible movies and literature clean there is nevertheless a profound implication yeah as the boys equations apply to all matter we can fundamentally establish that C equals hf where C stands for consciousness each for the constant of plank and f4 frequency see is responsible for what we experience as the now a quantized or minimum unit of an interaction the sum of all moment see up to the current moment is what shapes our concept of life this is not a philosophical or theoretical statement but an inherent consequence of all matter and energy being quantized the formula shows how life and death are abstract constructions of see another consequence of the boys equations is that the rate at which matter or energy fluctuates and acts like a way for a particle is relative to the frequency of the frame of reference increases in frequency due to velocity are relative to others and bring about phenomena such as time dilation the underlying reason is the unaffected experience of time relative to the reference free where space and time more properties of quanta and not the other way around purple Oh anti particles are created to everywhere in the universe where high energy particle collisions take place this process is artificially simulated in particle accelerators when matter is created antimatter is created simultaneously hence why the lack of antimatter in the universe is one of the biggest unsolved questions in physics to date when we trap anti particles through electromagnetic fields we can study their properties the quantum state of particles and antiparticles can be interchanged by applying the charge conjugation parity and time reversal operators to clarify it a physicist whose body was made of antimatter would do experiments in a laboratory also made of antimatter using chemicals and substances of and I particles he would find almost exactly the same results as his matter counterpart but when they would merge immense energy would be released proportional to their mass very recently from lab discovered how quanta such as museums are switching three trillion times per second from matter to antimatter when we study the universe from a quantized frame of reference see we have to take into account all experimental evidence that applies to quantum this includes our matter and antimatter are created simultaneously in particle accelerators and how many zones switch back and forth between one and the other this has significant consequences when applied to see from a quantum perspective every instance of C has an anti see this explains the missing symmetry or antimatter in the universe and is closely related to the arbitrary choice of scimitar and absorber in the wheeler Feynman time symmetric theory the unperturbed time T in the uncertainty principle is a required time or cycle for quantity to exist similar as observed in reasons our personal experience of time or interval of the current moment which is its threshold when c is cancelled out by its and icy seas interpretation of this single soften my lighting moment is framed within an abstract arrow of time if we then want to define interaction and look at the basic properties of the wave-particle duality of quanta or interactions would consist of interference and resonance but since this isn’t enough to explain the fundamental forces we are required to use different models this includes the standard model which mediates the dynamics of the news of atomic particles through force carriers and Einstein’s general relativity which describes macroscopic phenomena such as the orbits of planets which follow a curvature or ellipse in space and a helix in space-time but Einsteins model of space-time doesn’t hold up on quantum levels and the standard model needs additional force carriers to explain the origin of mass without success a unification of both models or theory of everything has been subjective much research quantum mechanics is really mathematical descriptions and their practical implications are often counterintuitive classical concepts such as length time mass energy can also be approached with similar descriptions by building on the boys equations we can substitute these concepts with abstract vectors this is a probability oriented approach towards the basic and already existing concepts in physics that allows us to unify quantum mechanics with Einstein’s relativity the boys equations show how all reference frames are quantized including all matter and all energy particle accelerators have demonstrated that matter and antimatter are always created simultaneously the paradox of how reality can emerge from abstract building blocks and annihilate each other can be explained by using these quanta as the frame of reference in a simplified analogy we need to look at things through the eyes of a futon the reference frame is always a quantum and defines how space-time is quantized when it increases or decreases space-time increases or decreases as well this is reflected in quantum mechanics as the mathematical description of the probability amplitude of the wave function or in Einstein’s relativity as time dilation and length contraction for a quantized frame of reference mass and energy can only be defined as abstract probabilities or if we want to be more concrete and establish a mathematical framework as Victor’s which can only exist when we assume an arrow of time they can be derived as a residence and interference with the reference frame which defines the minimum units or space time constant C equivalent to the constant of plank in quantum mechanics experiments show how conversion of matter into energy through its antimatter brings about galleries with exact opposite momentum what seems to be a conversion is the ratio between opposite of Victor’s interpreted this distance and time matter and antimatter mass and energy or interference and resonance within the abstract arrow of time of see the sum of opposite vectors is always 0 this is a reason for the symmetry your conservation walls and physics or Y at the speed of see time and space are zero due to length contraction and time dilation a consequence is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which states that certain pairs of physical properties such as position and momentum cannot be known simultaneously to high precision in a sense a single particle if its own field this does not explain our sense of continuity where c cancel it so fact within its own required interval but when these vectors are exponentially amplified or accelerated relative to and within the abstract arrow of time the underlying mathematical algorithms also describing the fundamental forces can bring about a consistent reality and have abstract building blocks this is why the harmonic motion equations are used in many fields of physics involving periodic phenomena such as quantum mechanics and electro dynamics or why Einstein equivalence principle used to derive the model of space-time states that there is no difference between gravity and acceleration because gravity is only a force when interpreted relative to an oscillating frame of reference this can be illustrated with a logarithmic spiral curve being reduced to a helix curve by the reference frame making objects pin and moving orbits visually simplified to amplified or growing apples will be interpreted to attract each other when observed by an amplified reference frame as the size seems unaffected the opposite occurs with interferes in a simplified analogy the increase or decrease in the size of objects as we get closer or further away is determined by the shifting vectors of the reference frame similar to our radio homes in on different ways to pick up radio stations this also applies to the influence of gravity in essence independently of any reference frame there are no fundamental forces all interactions within our abstract continuity can be mathematically derived through interference and residents as long as the ever-changing and fluctuating minimum unit or quantum being the frame of reference is taking into account experimental evidence includes the unseen effects in the standard model where we can see the force effect but not the actual force carriers yeah yeah the consistent continuity of reality it does not require quanta to have any specific sequence in time a quantum is not subject to any notion of space or time and can occupy all of its possible quantum states simultaneously this is called quantum superposition and has been demonstrated in experiments such as the double slit experiment or quantum teleportation where every electron in the universe for example could be the exact same one the only requirement for an abstract arrow of time and consistent continuity or reality is the algorithm describing the pattern or abstract sequence of vectors since this continuity brings about our ability to be self-aware it inherently makes the subject to its mathematical consequences the fundamental laws of physics interaction is merely an interpretation of what is essentially an abstract pattern this is why quantum mechanics can we provide mathematical descriptions since it can only describe patterns within infant probabilities when a probability is expressed as see the information necessary to describe the current moment or probability amplitude of c is also what embodies the arrow of time the nature of the arrow of time is one of the biggest unsolved problems in physics and has been responsible for many new popular interpretations the holographic principle for example a property of quantum gravity and three theories theorizes how the entire universe going to be seen as an information structure of we need two dimensions hmm yeah we traditionally associate the notion of an arrow of time with the sequence of events that we experience to the arrangement of short-term and long-term memories we can only have memories about the past and not about the future and we’ve always assumed that this reflects the flow of time scientists only began to question this logic when discoveries in quantum mechanics demonstrated that some phenomena are not bound by our notion of time and that our concept of it is nothing more than our perception of the changing observable values this is also reflected in time dilation and length contraction which are part of the reason why I’m Stein established that time and space are the same fabric in an absolute sense the notion of time does not differ from the notion of distance seconds are equal two light-seconds but cancel each other out to clarify with distance and time being each other’s opposites the passing of time can be interpreted as the distance that the hands of a clock travel as the wind direction that is opposite to time as they move forward in distance they effectively travel backwards in what we would call time this is also why any single separate minimum unit of experience is always instantly annihilated to within a timeless now this understanding sets the record straight between wave function collapse and quantum decoherence concepts such as life and death are mere intellectual constructs and any speculative spiritual ideas of an afterlife that takes place in a realm where the rigid mathematical underpinnings of this reality come to an end are equally fabricated an important cosmological consequence is that the Big Bang Theory where the universe is traced back to one . by looking at the past is a misconception the traditional assumption of space-time where space is three-dimensional and time plays the role of a fourth dimension is inaccurate if we would want to study the origin of the universe we would actually have to look forward since these time vector Direction is opposite to the arrow of distance from which we perceive an expanding universe although this temporal mapping of the universe will only yield abstract concepts with no relation to its quantum underpinnings experimental evidence includes the accelerating expanding universe following what is known to be an inverse or time reversed black hole metric as well as the many problems related to the big bang theory such as the horizon problem yeah these derivations could bring up questions about free will students awareness seems to only take place after the action within our perception of time most neurological investigations that have shed light on this question show that action is to be taken before becoming conscious of it but a deterministic point of view is based on an erroneous concept of time as is illustrated by the mathematical probability descriptions in quantum mechanics these understandings will be relevant for future neurological research since they show how any neural circuits is a vector with direction underpinning cognitive dissonance and interference or resonance within see the ability to understand then consciously alter these directions acquired through billions of years of evolution confirms how important our belief systems are in expanding more awareness and how they affect our working memory which is responsible for the extent to which we can make connections and for the neural processes that create meaning it also explains how artificial awareness will require a network of independent processors instead of a linear sequence of complex algorithms that feels grand unification is one solution that unifies quantum physics and Einstein’s theory of relativity while it answers many problems in physics such as the ones listed here it is my limited interpretation of his first months of scientific research whatever the outcome it is clear that we have entered an era where science is open to everyone and if we can preserve and filtered access to a neutral internet we can test the validity of our ideas we can enhance our imagination by making new coalition’s and we can be part of the evolution of our understandings of the universe and of the mind yeah yeah in quantum mechanics we have learned to approach reality differently and see everything as probabilities instead of certainties in a mathematical sense anything is possible as well as in science as in our daily lives the extent to which we can calculate or figure out probabilities is determined by our intellectual capability to recognize patterns the less biased we are the clear we can identify these patterns and base our actions on reasonable probabilities since it’s in the very nature of our brains left hemisphere to deny ideas that do not fit into our current paradigm the more attached we are to a belief system the less able we are to make conscious choices for ourselves but by observing this process we expand our awareness and enhance our free will it is said that wisdom comes with H but with openness n skepticism the key principles of the scientific method we don’t need decades of trial and error to sort out which of our convictions may be improbable the question is not whether our beliefs are right or wrong but the weather or not being emotionally attached to them is more or less likely going to benefit us there is no such thing as a free choice while being emotionally attached to a belief system the moment we are self-aware enough to realize this we can truly work together to figure out do real odds of what will benefit us the most yeah yeah yeah yeah